You Don’t Need Foreign Currency Mutual Funds to Bet on The Stock Exchange

May 7, 2010 · Filed Under Finance 

The case for currencies as an asset group is a discussion which has been gaining more and more currency nowadays. In 2009, currency exchange-traded funds saw inflows of approximately $3.7 billion, not bad considering that as of the end of March there had been about $6.2 bill invested across twenty-eight currency funds.

This is another example of ETFs democratizing an asset sector that was previously troublesome or impractical for retail speculators to get access to the stock market today. Nonetheless just because these tools are widely available to everyone doesn’t suggest they are suitable.

Before speeding to get a currency ETF or ETN, it’d be helpful to evaluate the implicit currency gambles that might already be skulking inside your portfolio. U.S.-based stockholders who own non-U.S. Assets most likely already have sizable exposure to foreign currencies. Remember, the total return of foreign assets is made of two parts : its local price return and the currency’s change relative to the greenback over the investment period in the stock market. As international stock and bond grants make up larger and larger pieces of many investors’ portfolios, it becomes increasingly crucial to recognize and understand the impact that currency exposure can have on your portfolio’s hazards and returns.

Consider some examples. In local currency terms, the MSCI Australia Index returned approximately 32% from the start of 2009 through mid-April, but in U.S. Buck terms the return was well over seventy pc. Over the same period, we saw similar cases with Brazil and Canada. The local returns for the MSCI Brazil Index and the MSCI Canada Index were about 54% and 31% [*COMMA”> respectively [*T”>. In U.S. Bucks nonetheless , Brazil more than doubled and the Canadian index enjoyed a return of roughly 60%.

By the same rule, a strengthening U.S. Dollar relative to a foreign currency would be a drag on the total return of unhedged global stocks. We saw this back in 2005 when the buck was buttressing against most other currencies. As an example, the local stock market return for the MSCI UK Index in 2005 was 20.1%–not too tacky. But the pound sterling lost virtually 13% of its price against the U.S. Dollar, leaving U.S.-based financiers with a total return of 7.4%. Similarly, the local currency MSCI Japan Index rose 44.6% in 2005, but because the yen lost roughly 19.1% relative to the buck over the same period, U.S. Investors “only ” enjoyed a return of 25.5%.

As the prior stock market analysis examples above illustrate, it can be critically vital to understand the source of your investment returns. Again, this isn’t to say that stockholders should consider plowing into currency ETFs or opening a 24 hour forex trading account. Rather, simply knowing the source of our total returns can be beneficial info when rebalancing our portfolios or changing our tactical bets.

To help speculators isolate local marketplace returns, some ETF suppliers are rolling out international products that include inserted currency hedges. Such products would be acceptable for those wanting to avoid the added volatility that movements in foreign exchange rates can have on world investments. They also help financiers limit their total outlay and avoid the added transaction costs from handling their own hedges through additional currency instruments.

While the currency market is the largest and most liquid market in the world, with over $3 trillion trading a day typically studies indicate that it is still less efficient than other asset sectors. This is thanks to the collusion of several non-profit-seeking players in the market.

Even still, with so many factors simultaneously influencing currency movements, identifying inefficiencies and gaining profits from them can prove highly slippery. Similarly, there isn’t any telling how long a currency might wander from its underlying basic worth. Considering the problems embedded in currency investing, tactical investors looking to milk such inefficiencies may want to solicit the expertise of pro money managers.

Moreover, we should note that currencies are a zero-sum game–as opposed to stocks or bonds, there is no positive expected return above the risk free rate in currencies over the long term. Exchange rates measure the relative values between currencies. Thus, theoretically, the specific values of every currency cannot all increase over the same time frame–one currency’s appreciation will equal the equivalent aggregate depreciation in other currencies.

Comments

Comments are closed.